
Yes indeed, the attacks of
9/11 were five years ago today.
Naturally, there has been a vast amount of press coverage and TV airspace over the past week or two, devoted to this very subject. Apart from anything else, it serves to remind us just how little of this atrocity has been resolved in the years since. If one person has moved to the fore recently, in the ongoing quest for the truth to be told about that day, it's got to be
Charlie Sheen.
To anyone who hasn't been on planet Earth for the past 6 months, Mr. Sheen has gone public on primetime TV in the U.S. making known his view that the events of
9/11 were possibly brought about, one way or another, by the U.S. government.
Apparently, elements of the stateside press have attempted to use his hard-partying past as some kind of mark of his lack of credibility as a social-commentator.
It's difficult to see the logic here - I

f such credentials are an automatic indication of a somehow dubious personality, whose judgement we should instinctively distrust, it may be worth remembering that the
President himself is a recovering alcoholic, and as numerous published accounts of his life will attest, no stranger to life's ... well, short-term pleasures.
In spite of this, he has somehow managed to become the most powerful individual on Earth.
... And so back to the events of 9/11.
To even the most impartial observer, the inconsistencies come thick and fast. A few minor examples:
Why were both
Mayor of San Francisco, Willie Brown and author
Salman Rushdie, amongst others, warned by the Whitehouse not to fly to New York on that morning?
Why was Federal Law allowing airline pilots to carry handguns (instigated following the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962) repealed only months earlier?
Did you know that
George Bush's brother Marvin, was head of security for the World Trade Compex until his contract ran out on 9/11?
... or that
Larry Silverstein, leaseholder of the World Trade Complex took out a
7 billion dollar insurance policy specifically covering acts of terrorism, only months before?
The flights that were highjacked were only 20% full, and flight-records reveal that they were
not even scheduled to fly on that day.
Then there is the mystery of World Trade
Building 7, the 47-storey structure not hit by any plane but brought down in an identical fashion to the north and south towers. A block away from the latter, this building housed a government command bunker, along with the HQ of the Secret Service, FBI and the CIA, amongst other official bodies.
Larry Silverstein has
admitted on television news that between himself and the NYFD commander, it was decided to '
Pull' Building 7.
'Pull' is a term used in controlled demolition whereby
explosives inside a building are detonated to affect it's collapse.
However,
there were still people in Building 7 when it fell, who died as a result, so why have no charges been brought?
In February of 2002
Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So, this building's collapse resulted in a profit of about
$500 million.Then we have
The Pentagon and the
'Missing Airplane', the one that doesn't seem to be present in any of the press-shots or available CCTV footage. The same plane that, we're asked to believe, performed a 270 degree turn at 500 mph, dropped more than 7,000 feet in just over 2 minutes, and flew at tree-top height for the last 500 metres of it's journey into the walls of the Pentagon building.
Even the most casual inspection of events immediately begins to reveal questions that cannot be ignored.
In response to the media dismissal of this entire line of enquiry as just another screwball conspiracy theory, I quote Charlie Sheen himself (click to view):
Nineteen amateurs with box-cutters, taking over four commercial airliners, and hitting 75% of their targets? That feels like a Conspiracy Theory...Recommended further reading: